| Review 1: Project Synopsis/Proposal Evaluation (5 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Problem Statement and Objectives | 40% | 2 | CO1 |
| Tools and Technologies Identified | 40% | 2 | CO2 |
| Feasibility and Innovation | 20% | 1 | CO1 |
| Review 2: First Project Progress Evaluation (5 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Initial Development Progress | 40% | 2 | CO1 |
| Effective Use of Tools and Frameworks | 40% | 2 | CO2 |
| Team Collaboration and Communication | 20% | 1 | CO3 |
| Review 3: Second Project Progress Evaluation (5 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Intermediate Development Progress | 40% | 2 | CO1 |
| Integration of Advanced Features and Technologies | 40% | 2 | CO4 |
| Teamwork and Coordination | 20% | 1 | CO3 |
| Review 4: End Term Internal Project Evaluation (10 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Final Application Functionality and Performance | 50% | 5 | CO1, CO2 |
| Performance and Compatibility | 30% | 3 | CO4 |
| Quality of Documentation | 10% | 1 | CO3 |
| Presentation and Demonstration | 10% | 1 | CO1, CO2 |
| COs-wise Marks Distribution | |||
| CO Number | Description | Reviews Covered | Total Marks |
| CO1 | Identify and solve real-world challenges in mobile application development projects. | Review 1, Review 2, Review 3, Review 4 | 10 |
| CO2 | Utilize tools, frameworks, and technologies effectively for mobile application development. | Review 1, Review 2, Review 4 | 7 |
| CO3 | Collaborate effectively with team members to design, develop, and deploy mobile applications, fostering teamwork and synergy. | Review 2, Review 3, Review 4 | 3 |
| CO4 | Apply advanced technologies to enhance performance and compatibility of diverse devices and platforms. | Review 3, Review 4 | 5 |
| Review 1: Synopsis Submission (10 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Understanding and Definition of the Problem | 40% | 4 | CO1 |
| Objectives, Approach, and Feasibility | 40% | 4 | CO1 |
| Identification of Required Skills and Tools | 20% | 2 | CO3 |
| Review 2: Mid-Term Evaluation (15 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Progress in Problem Solving and Task Completion | 40% | 6 | CO1, CO3 |
| Application of Professional Skills (Teamwork, Communication, Project Management) | 20% | 3 | CO2 |
| Use of Industry-Standard Tools and Technologies | 20% | 3 | CO3 |
| Mid-Term Report Quality and Insight | 20% | 3 | CO4 |
| Review 3: Final Evaluation (25 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Problem Analysis and Solutions Implemented | 40% | 10 | CO1, CO3 |
| Demonstrated Professional Skills | 20% | 5 | CO2 |
| Final Report and Documentation | 20% | 5 | CO4 |
| Presentation and Overall Performance | 20% | 5 | CO4 |
| COs-wise Marks Distribution | |||
| CO Number | Description | Total Marks | |
| CO1 | Examine and evaluate problems given by industry. | 16 | |
| CO2 | Learn professional skills such as teamwork, communication, and project management in an industry setting. | 8 | |
| CO3 | Employ industry-standard tools and technologies to successfully complete assigned tasks and projects. | 12 | |
| CO4 | Develop comprehensive documentation summarizing project outcomes and detailing the skills acquired during the internship. | 13 | |
| Review 1: Project Synopsis / Proposal Evaluation (10 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Clarity of Problem Statement | 20% | 2 | CO1 |
| Defined Objectives and Scope | 20% | 2 | CO1 |
| Feasibility and Innovation | 20% | 2 | CO1 |
| Methodology and Planning | 20% | 2 | CO1 |
| Overall Presentation and Articulation | 20% | 2 | CO1 |
| Review 2: First Project Evaluation (20 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Initial Progress and Milestones | 25% | 5 | CO2 |
| Effective Team Collaboration and Communication | 25% | 5 | CO2 |
| Initial Resource Allocation and Utilization | 25% | 5 | CO2 |
| Quality of Initial Deliverables | 25% | 5 | CO2 |
| Review 3: Second Project Evaluation (20 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Intermediate Progress and Milestones | 25% | 5 | CO3 |
| Technical Problem-Solving | 25% | 5 | CO3 |
| Implementation of Technical Solutions | 25% | 5 | CO3 |
| Quality of Intermediate Deliverables | 25% | 5 | CO3 |
| Review 4: Third Project Evaluation (20 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Advanced Progress and Milestones | 25% | 5 | CO4 |
| Technical Implementation and Testing | 25% | 5 | CO4 |
| Analysis and Discussion of Results | 25% | 5 | CO4 |
| Quality of Documentation | 25% | 5 | CO4 |
| Review 5: End Term Internal Project Evaluation (30 Marks) | |||
| Criteria | Weightage | Marks | CO Mapping |
| Final Presentation and Articulation | 33% | 10 | CO5 |
| Overall Project Execution and Delivery | 33% | 10 | CO5 |
| Ability to Address Questions and Critical Feedback | 34% | 10 | CO5 |
| COs-wise Marks Distribution | |||
| CO Number | Description | Reviews Covered | Total Marks |
| CO1 | Understand and formulate a project proposal with clear objectives, scope, and methodology. | Review 1 | 10 |
| CO2 | Demonstrate effective project planning, management, and execution skills. | Review 2 | 20 |
| CO3 | Implement technical solutions effectively and efficiently to address project objectives. | Review 3 | 20 |
| CO4 | Develop a comprehensive project report that includes technical implementation, process documentation, and analysis of outcomes. | Review 4 | 20 |
| CO5 | Communicate project outcomes effectively through oral presentations and written documentation. | Review 5 | 30 |
